Chapter 2

• Study designs in medicine fall into two categories: studies in which subjects are observed, and studies in which the effect of an intervention is observed.
• Observational studies may be forward-looking (cohort), backward-looking (case-control), or looking at simultaneous events (cross-sectional). Cohort studies generally provide stronger evidence than the other two designs.
• Studies that examine patient outcomes are increasingly published in the literature; they focus on specific topics, such as resource utilization, functional status, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness.
• Studies with interventions are called experiments or clinical trials. They provide stronger evidence than observational studies.
• The single best way to minimize bias is to randomly select subjects in observational studies or randomly assign subjects to different treatment arms in clinical trials.
• Bias occurs when the way a study is designed or carried out causes an error in the results and conclusions. Bias can be due to the manner in which subjects are selected or data are collected and analyzed.
• Clinical trials without controls (subjects who do not receive the intervention) are difficult to interpret and do not provide strong evidence.
• Each study design has specific advantages and disadvantages.

This chapter introduces the different kinds of studies commonly used in medical research. Because we believe that knowing how a study is designed is important for understanding the conclusions that can be drawn from it, we have chosen to devote considerable attention to the topic of study designs.

If you are familiar with the medical literature, you will recognize many of the terms used to describe different study designs. If you are just beginning to read the literature, you should not be dismayed by all the new terminology; there will be ample opportunity to review and become familiar with it. Also, the glossary at the end of the book defines the terms we use here. In the final chapter of this book, study designs are reviewed within the context of reading journal articles, and pointers are given on how to look for possible biases that can occur in medical studies. Bias can be due to the manner in which patients are selected, data are collected and analyzed, or conclusions are drawn.

There are several different schemes for classifying study designs. We have adopted one that divides studies into those in which the subjects were merely observed, sometimes called observational studies, and those in which some intervention was performed, generally called experiments. This approach is simple and reflects the sequence an investigation sometimes takes. With a little practice, you should be able to read medical articles and classify studies according to the outline in Table 2–1 with little difficulty.

Table 2–1. Classification of Study Designs.

Sign in to your MyAccess profile while you are actively authenticated on this site via your institution (you will be able to verify this by looking at the top right corner of the screen - if you see your institution's name, you are authenticated). Once logged in to your MyAccess profile, you will be able to access your institution's subscription for 90 days from any location. You must be logged in while authenticated at least once every 90 days to maintain this remote access.

Ok

If your institution subscribes to this resource, and you don't have a MyAccess profile, please contact your library's reference desk for information on how to gain access to this resource from off-campus.

## Subscription Options

### AccessPharmacy Full Site: One-Year Subscription

Connect to the full suite of AccessPharmacy content and resources including 30+ textbooks such as Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach and Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, high-quality videos, images, and animations, interactive board review, drug and herb/supplements databases, and more.