Skip to Main Content

We have a new app!

Take the Access library with you wherever you go—easy access to books, videos, images, podcasts, personalized features, and more.

Download the Access App here: iOS and Android


Malnutrition occurs in 30–50% of hospitalized patients depending upon the setting and criteria that are used. Poor wound healing, compromised immune status, impaired organ function, increased length of hospital stay, and increased mortality are among the notable adverse outcomes associated with malnutrition. It is now widely appreciated that acute or chronic inflammation contribute to the pathophysiology of disease-related or injury-related malnutrition. The presence of inflammation can also render historic nutrition assessment indicators, like albumin and prealbumin, unreliable and inflammation diminishes favorable responses to nutrition therapies. In order to guide appropriate care, it is necessary to properly assess and diagnose malnutrition. Nutrition assessment is a comprehensive evaluation to diagnose a malnutrition syndrome and to guide intervention and expected outcomes. Patients are often targeted for assessment after being identified at nutritional risk based upon screening procedures conducted by nursing or nutrition personnel within 24 h of hospital admission. Screening tends to focus explicitly on a few risk variables like weight loss, compromised dietary intake, and high risk medical/surgical diagnoses. Preferably, health professionals complement this screening with a systematic approach to comprehensive nutrition assessment that incorporates an appreciation for the contributions of inflammation that serve as the basis for new approaches to the diagnosis and management of malnutrition syndromes.


image Famine and starvation have long been leading causes of malnutrition and remain so in developing countries. However, with improvements in agriculture, education, public health, healthcare, and living standards, malnutrition in the settings of disease, surgery, and injury has become a prevalent concern throughout the world. Malnutrition now encompasses the full continuum of undernutrition and over-nutrition (obesity). For the objectives of this chapter, we will focus upon the former. Historic definitions for malnutrition syndromes are problematic in their use of diagnostic criteria that suffer poor sensitivity, sensitivity, and inter-observer reliability. Definitions overlap and confusion and misdiagnosis are frequent. In addition, some approaches do not recognize undernutrition in obese persons. While the historic syndromes of marasmus, kwashiorkor, and protein-calorie malnutrition remain in use, this chapter will instead highlight new insights to the diagnosis of malnutrition syndromes.

The Subjective Global Assessment, a comprehensive nutrition assessment that included a metabolic stress of disease component, was described and validated in the 1980s. In 2010, an International Consensus Guideline Committee incorporated a new appreciation for the role of inflammatory response into their proposed nomenclature for nutrition diagnosis in adults in the clinical practice setting. Starvation-associated malnutrition, when there is chronic starvation without inflammation (anorexia nervosa or major depression with lack of interest in eating), chronic disease-associated malnutrition, when inflammation is chronic and of mild to moderate degree (e.g., organ failure, pancreatic cancer, or sarcopenic obesity), and acute disease or injury-associated malnutrition, when inflammation is acute and of severe degree (e.g., major infection, burns, trauma, or closed head injury). In 2012, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition ...

Pop-up div Successfully Displayed

This div only appears when the trigger link is hovered over. Otherwise it is hidden from view.