Skip to Main Content

Instructors can request access to the Casebook Instructor's Guide on AccessPharmacy. Email User Services (userservices@mheducation.com) for more information.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completing this case study, the reader should be able to:

  • Recognize risk factors associated with development of erectile dysfunction (ED).

  • Provide brief descriptions of the advantages and disadvantages of the common therapies available for treating ED.

  • Recommend appropriate first- and second-line therapy for treatment of ED.

  • Provide appropriate patient education on administration and expected side effects of selected treatment modalities for ED.

PATIENT PRESENTATION

Chief Complaint

“I’m having trouble in the bedroom lately….”

HPI

Peter Johnson is a 63-year-old man who presents to his PCP with the above complaint. On questioning, he states that for the past year he has been able to achieve only partial erections that are insufficient for intercourse. He notices occasional nocturnal penile tumescence. He feels that the problem is leading to a strained relationship with his wife. He has tried a couple of herbal products or “natural supplements” that he ordered over the Internet, but they did not help.

PMH

Type 2 DM × 14 years

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy

HTN

Dyslipidemia

CKD stage 3

FH

Father deceased at age 72 secondary to MI; mother alive with HTN

SH

Married for 38 years; no history of marital problems; 20 pack-year smoking history; does not drink alcohol; walks for 30 minutes 3 days per week

Meds

Insulin glargine 60 units SC at bedtime

Metformin 1000 mg PO BID

Dulaglutide 1.5 mg SQ once weekly

Gabapentin 600 mg PO TID

Lisinopril 40 mg PO once daily

Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg PO once daily

Atorvastatin 80 mg PO once daily

ASA 81 mg PO once daily

All

NKDA

ROS

Denies significant life stressors, fatigue, urgency, or symptoms of prostatitis. Complains of occasional nocturia, numbness, burning and tingling in his feet, and difficulty achieving and maintaining erections.

Physical Examination

Gen

Alert, well-developed, cooperative man in NAD

VS

BP 131/78 mm Hg, P 60 bpm, RR 18, T 37.2°C; Wt 120 kg, Ht 5′10″

Skin

Warm, dry; no lesions

HEENT

NC/AT; EOMI; PERRLA; funduscopic examination shows no arteriolar narrowing, hemorrhages, or exudates

Neck/Lymph Nodes...

Pop-up div Successfully Displayed

This div only appears when the trigger link is hovered over. Otherwise it is hidden from view.